|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
BMW Z2 Roadster Under Consideration, on FWD Platform
|
|
01-14-2013, 01:42 PM | #111 |
Captain
154
Rep 688
Posts |
The complete car is HIDEOUS whether looking at the front, side, rear, drivetrain. DAMN Chris Bangle looks like a fricking designer of GOD's caliber, than who thought of this crap
__________________
Lone Star Chapter BMWCCA HPDE Event Chair, Texas Trifecta Event Chair, & BMWCCA driving Instructor |
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2013, 09:25 PM | #112 |
Second Lieutenant
16
Rep 240
Posts |
Is it really that much cheaper to make it a FWD?
__________________
e92 335i sport[/B] 2 GO: Cobb AP Stg 2+, Macht Schnell DPs, Injen intake, Spearco FMIC, Velocity throttle booster, DBA 4000xs rotors, Vibrant Performance catback, Synapse BOV & charge pipe, Hancook V12 EVOs 4 SHOW: DCT paddles, cusco strut, piano black trim, Mtech bumper, aero lip, 19" Miro 111's, angel eye, black: window trim, side mark, kidneys |
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2013, 06:09 AM | #113 |
General
18983
Rep 19,612
Posts |
Yes, because the "platform" that underpins the car is based on the upcoming Mini/1-Series. The platform (basic chassis design) is the most expensive part of the car to manufacture. Sharing the platform over several different models allows for the manufacturer to amortize the cost of manufacturing over a larger number of car units, thus reducing the unit-cost to manufacture a particular model based off the (shared) platform.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2013, 08:39 AM | #114 |
TIM YOYO
1506
Rep 3,282
Posts
Drives: 2013 M3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
|
Yes, absolutely.
Steel isn't cheap, and components like drive shafts and drive axles use a lot of it. There are also a lot of packaging constraints that FWD solves, making the car less expensive. You can use less metal in the construction of the chassis when building a FWD car. Straight lines are shorter than curved lines when measured along the contour, so the "hump" required to accommodate the drive shaft actually has a measurable impact on the amount of steel used. You can also make a FWD more compact (dimensionally) because the rear axle and suspension doesn't need to accommodate a differential. Also, the engine is oriented transversely, which allows you to make the car shorter. The trouble is that all these packaging advantages trade off in two areas: 1) Front/rear weight balance 2) Engine position in relation to the front axle It's impossible to achieve near 50/50 weight balance in a FWD car, and even if you do, the polar moment of inertia is going to be higher than a front-mid engine RWD car like BMW currently makes. Can't change the laws of physics.
__________________
His: 2019 R1250GS - Black
Hers: 2013 X3 28i - N20 Mineral Silver / Sand Beige / Premium, Tech Past: 2013 ///M3 - Interlagos Blue Black M-DCT Past: 2010 135i - TiAg Coral Red 6MT ///M-Sport |
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2013, 01:36 PM | #115 |
Major General
5387
Rep 5,824
Posts |
The appeal of the FWD cars will rely on the full package and having seen the first wave of models shared with MINI , the visual aesthetic is typical BMW the design is modern and the concept extends individuality against the mainstream choices.
If you thought the current line up of MINI models was impressive then the next generation will floor you because the desirability is kicked up a notch as is model progression . Stand out has to be the Traveller , again it conforms to the dare to be different visual appeal of the BMW Active Tourer it is more visually than what you expect in a van with a glasshouse. The key important aspect between BMW and MINI is that although everything is shared, every aspect of the cars are developed to be a signature of each brand.k
__________________
The M850i is evidence that BMW have got their mojo back when it comes to dynamic sports cars...
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2013, 09:57 PM | #117 | |
Lieutenant
75
Rep 487
Posts |
Quote:
Audi was not an official brand until the mid 80's and their naming convention, eg. A4, A6, etc started in the 90s. I see Audi in the same level as Lexus. Sure, they are luxury brands and share the market with Mercedes-Benz and BMW but I don't see them as equal to Mercedes-Benz or BMW. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2013, 12:23 AM | #118 | |
Lieutenant
38
Rep 427
Posts |
Quote:
In comparison, the first modern BMW was the 1962 BMW 1500. Older cars like the Isetta and 700 had very little in common with modern BMWs. Most people don't even know that in the first 20 or so years after Word War II, BMW was primarily known as a manufacturer of economy cars. Last edited by Ti335; 01-16-2013 at 12:37 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2013, 06:03 AM | #119 | |
General
18983
Rep 19,612
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2013, 12:17 AM | #120 | |
Lieutenant
75
Rep 487
Posts |
Quote:
For comparison, BMW history goes back to 1917 but I'd say BMW got big in the 60s with New Class and New Six then the 3, 5, 7 series in the 70s. But honestly, it doesn't matter. What I meant to say, my message was, that Audi was not popular/big until 90s. I've been to junk yards and if you've ever been to a junk yard, they usually have cars from the 80s and 90s and you see a load of BMWs and Mercedes' but you don't really see an Audi. Last time I went to the junk yard, I actually paid attention and found TWO Audi's in the entire lot compared to many BMW's and MB's (hard to put a number but I'd say about 30-50 each) In addition, when I go to Cars and Coffee in Irvine weekly, I consistently see quite a few BMW's from 60s and 70s (I'd say about 5 every week) and a LOT of current/recent BMW's, lately mostly the M5. I see many Mercedes' from 50s (about 5-7 every week) and a quite few current ones. On the other hand, I've yet to see a single "classic" Audi. I might've seen an Audi 80 once. And I rarely see a current Audi (A4, A5, A6, A8, etc). I do see R8's every other week.. some weeks there are none, some weeks there are like 5 lol. Main point: Audi was not big until 90s. I don't care when they said the company was established. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2013, 01:22 AM | #122 | |
Lieutenant
38
Rep 427
Posts |
Quote:
Here's a classic Audi for ya: and another one: and another one: and another one: and another one: and let's not forget this one: Last edited by Ti335; 01-17-2013 at 01:33 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2013, 05:56 AM | #123 | |
General
18983
Rep 19,612
Posts |
Quote:
So now that Audi is part of the VW group is it a VW or an Audi? Just curious. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2013, 06:00 AM | #124 |
General
18983
Rep 19,612
Posts |
You left out the Brazilian-built Audi Fox. Apparently "basically non-existant" German auto companies have enough financial resources to build factories in foriegn countries. LOL.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2013, 08:02 AM | #125 | |
Lieutenant
75
Rep 487
Posts |
Quote:
But from what I hear, Audi is the best seller in Western Europe. This year, BMW sold 1.8 mil, Audi sold 1.6 mil, Mercedes sold 1.45 mil (I forget exactly) That makes me super curious if Audi's are super common in Europe All I was trying to say was that Audi is not a truly prestigious brand imo, not as desirable as BMW, the same way BMW isn't quite as prestigious as Mercedes. (We've come a long way in the past 20 years though) I see Mercedes and BMW almost every street and every time I'm on the freeway but I don't see Audi's nearly much at all and I do pay attention for cars when I'm on the road Cheers! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2013, 08:14 AM | #126 | |
Lieutenant
75
Rep 487
Posts |
Quote:
I guess when I said "Audi didn't exist until the 90s," that was a big exaggeration you didn't appreciate and I apologize. But I was really saying that they were not big until then, the same way BMW wasn't big until the 60s/70s. I don't even care, but are you aware that the four ring logo is a Auto Union logo and Audi had its own logo? As I was not even born then, I could be wrong. When I was growing up and didn't know anything about cars, I liked Audi's because of their design and I just liked the logo. But I like Audi's less and less now. I see Audi's as expensive Volkswagens. Majority of Audi's we see on the road are front-wheel drives (unless it says Quattro of course). Maybe luxury doesn't have to be RWD but as of now, it does. My bestfriend owns a Volkswagen and when I went to check out Audi at their dealership a couple months ago, I was shocked. Everything looks and feels the same. The buttons, etc. I'd get Audi over BMW or Mercedes only if I had a specific budget and I really didn't want to spend a few grand more Cheers Last edited by sonicbimmer19; 01-17-2013 at 08:23 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2013, 08:23 PM | #127 | |
General
18983
Rep 19,612
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2013, 08:55 PM | #128 |
White Shark
88
Rep 919
Posts |
meh..
__________________
ESS | Challenge x-pipe | Akrapovic | Stoptech BBK (380/355) |Ohlins R&T | Dinan | Vorsteiner | Downforce USA | Varis Diffuser | Gintani | UUC | BMW Performance | Macht Schnell | Forgestar F14's SDC 19x9.5F 19x11R | 255.35 295.30
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2013, 10:29 PM | #129 | |
Lieutenant
38
Rep 427
Posts |
Quote:
In Germany, Audi is by far the best selling luxury car. More than that, it's the second best selling car brand period, second only to VW. To me, success in the German domestic market is much more indicative of the true quality of the product than success in the USA. Most Americans have absolutely terrible taste in automobiles and spend big money crappy cars like Lincoln, Lexus, Cadillac Escalade, etc. Audi also easily outsells Mercedes and BMW in the rest of Europe, Russia, China and many other Asian countries. Audi's sales are also growing at a greater rate as compared to BMW's or MB's. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-18-2013, 11:19 PM | #130 | |
Lieutenant
75
Rep 487
Posts |
Quote:
Mercedes has more "mass" production cars over $100k: S, CL, G, SL (and SLS). Compared to BMW only has M6 (not to mention not as rich in history as Mercedes cars such as SL) I am aware that when you compare 535i to E350, 535i is more expensive, but when you think Mercedes, you think of big and expensive cars such as S, CL, SL, G. When you think BMW, you think of 3 series and maybe 5 series. If you ask an average person, sure, he or she might not know the gap between Mercedes, BMW, Audi, Lexus, Cadillac and say they are all on the same level, but I think the hierarchy definitely exists and it will not just go away overnight. IMO, it goes Mercedes, BMW, Audi, Lexus, Infiniti, Acura. Not sure where Cadillac would be.. probably between Lexus and Infiniti. If I may add, as last thought, I'm pretty sure even an average person knows Mercedes and BMW are at least slightly "better" than Audi. At least in the US. Cheers! edit: p.s. I'm not sure how sales figures show which brand is more prestigious. BMW sells the most globally but I don't think BMW is more prestigious than Mercedes because of that. When you see what cars celebrities and sports stars drive, not counting super luxury cars such as Rolls Royce, Bentley, Lamborghini, Ferrari, majority of them drives a Mercedes or/and Range Rover. I think that's another "proof" Just my personal opinion, of course Last edited by sonicbimmer19; 01-18-2013 at 11:35 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2013, 05:49 AM | #131 | |
General
18983
Rep 19,612
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2013, 12:08 PM | #132 | |
Private First Class
2
Rep 100
Posts |
Quote:
Agree that FWD is popular mainly because it gives you more flexibility when designing an interior and facilitating a more spacious and flexible layout. But in the context of a 2 seater sports car that latter benefit is completely irrelevant - a spacious, flexible interior is NOT one of a sports car designer's priorities!! So this is going to be a boulevard cruiser for ladies with unusually high levels of space for shopping and handbags that won't handle like a proper sports car, whatever this guy says! It's a little bit embarassing that Mazda can stick to the right formula but BMW can't .... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rear_wh...e#Advantages_2 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|