E90Post
 


 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > Off-Topic Discussions Board > Should sections of our interstate system be free of speed limits?



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-14-2013, 07:26 PM   #23
Titanium3er
First Lieutenant
Titanium3er's Avatar
United_States
19
Rep
345
Posts

Drives: '08 335i, '03 Kawa Z1000
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SW FL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by justinnum1
No. It increases the chance of accidents for regular motorists.
Well that's a very simple response to a complicated question.

I take it you didn't look at the studies?
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2013, 07:47 PM   #24
justinnum1
Major General
651
Rep
5,803
Posts

Drives: 2018 330i Msport 6mt
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Florida

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Titanium3er View Post
Well that's a very simple response to a complicated question.

I take it you didn't look at the studies?
I have seen studies that say speeding increases the chances of an accident. Unless it is an isolated lane, I think no speed limits is to dangerous.
__________________
F30 330i Alpine white/Coral red Msport 6MT
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2013, 09:04 PM   #25
manutdas11
EL JIMMY NEURON
manutdas11's Avatar
United_States
44
Rep
1,180
Posts

Drives: Jet Black E90
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: in the Napa Valley/SJ...

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaArtist View Post
When people still don't understand how to use a passing lane, move over for faster traffic, or keep 3 seconds behind someone on the freeway when you're traveling 80mph, you know we're not ready for an Autobahn styled experience.
THIS.
__________________
2007 Jet Black E90 328i
Thread: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=825249
Instagram: manutd_as
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2013, 09:10 PM   #26
jaco
Captain
United_States
44
Rep
598
Posts

Drives: 2011 E90 M3 SSII
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indy

iTrader: (2)

i would be afraid of all the shit boxes out on the highways with a blowout ready to happen at any moment.

If i fly by at 120 and that happens... I am toast.
__________________
Jacob

2015 Chevy SS In
2011 E90 M3 DCT SSII Out
Appreciate 0
      08-15-2013, 09:49 AM   #27
Templar
Lieutenant Colonel
Templar's Avatar
United_States
264
Rep
1,883
Posts

Drives: 2011 E92 M3
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: One of the coasts...

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2011 BMW M3  [10.00]
Pretty much what everyone else said. Without tougher drivers ed and requirements to get the license, it would be a mess.

After living in Germany for a while, I know they are doing it right...
__________________
'11 BMW E92 ///M3 - ZCP and DCT
'15 Ford F-250 - Lariat, 6.7 Powerstroke Turbo-diesel
Appreciate 0
      08-15-2013, 12:40 PM   #28
NemesisX
Captain
317
Rep
905
Posts

Drives: '19 Infiniti Q60S
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: TX

iTrader: (0)

I'd caution against reading too much into a study by CATO, as they have a vested interest in promoting a "hands-off" policy for philosophical reasons (CATO is a libertarian think tank). I know I might get some flack for trying to hold a study like this to the standards of scientific rigor, but shedding bias and encouraging peer review are feasible standards to strive for even at this level. And moreover, the second link Titanium3er posted actually contained a variety of miniature case studies with different results. A small case study in Michigan showed that increasing speed limits doesn't increase fatalities. A case study elsewhere showed that increasing speed limits does increase fatalities, albeit slightly.

In principle though I'm all for legally increasing speed limits. I have no problem with speeding in and of itself. What usually worried me was speed differential, though not in the absolute naive sense of the phrase (i.e. car 1 travels at 75 in a 70, car 2 travels at 90 in a 70, and I'm worried about 90-75 = 15 MPH). When I say "speed differential," I mean the following -

Car 1 travels at 75 in a 70
Car 2 (coming up from behind) is traveling at 95 in a 70
Car 1 expects car 2 (and all other cars, in fact) to drive within +/- 10 MPH of the posted speed limit.

It's the differential between the speed at which the average driver expects fellow drivers to be driving at and the actual speed they are driving at that worries me. And, I think the importance of paying attention to this difference is magnified on highly interconnected road networks with slower speed limits. People approach a T intersection and are trying to take a right turn and merge onto a 45 MPH street (for example). There's an expectation that fellow drivers around that blind curve aren't flying down at 70 or 80.
Appreciate 0
      08-15-2013, 03:31 PM   #29
Titanium3er
First Lieutenant
Titanium3er's Avatar
United_States
19
Rep
345
Posts

Drives: '08 335i, '03 Kawa Z1000
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SW FL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by NemesisX View Post
I'd caution against reading too much into a study by CATO, as they have a vested interest in promoting a "hands-off" policy for philosophical reasons (CATO is a libertarian think tank). I know I might get some flack for trying to hold a study like this to the standards of scientific rigor, but shedding bias and encouraging peer review are feasible standards to strive for even at this level. And moreover, the second link Titanium3er posted actually contained a variety of miniature case studies with different results. A small case study in Michigan showed that increasing speed limits doesn't increase fatalities. A case study elsewhere showed that increasing speed limits does increase fatalities, albeit slightly.

In principle though I'm all for legally increasing speed limits. I have no problem with speeding in and of itself. What usually worried me was speed differential, though not in the absolute naive sense of the phrase (i.e. car 1 travels at 75 in a 70, car 2 travels at 90 in a 70, and I'm worried about 90-75 = 15 MPH). When I say "speed differential," I mean the following -

Car 1 travels at 75 in a 70
Car 2 (coming up from behind) is traveling at 95 in a 70
Car 1 expects car 2 (and all other cars, in fact) to drive within +/- 10 MPH of the posted speed limit.

It's the differential between the speed at which the average driver expects fellow drivers to be driving at and the actual speed they are driving at that worries me. And, I think the importance of paying attention to this difference is magnified on highly interconnected road networks with slower speed limits. People approach a T intersection and are trying to take a right turn and merge onto a 45 MPH street (for example). There's an expectation that fellow drivers around that blind curve aren't flying down at 70 or 80.
I don't think the fact that this study was done by CATO alone disproves it. If you had issues with the data they used or their methodology, that would be a different story. I actually find their positions in general to be pretty convincing. I'm sure this isn't the case for someone who disagrees with their libertarian philosophies.

Regardless of your feelings on CATO, it's widely accepted that the fatality rate decreased when the federal government allowed states to raise their speed limits to 65 mph in the late 80's. Whether or not this would remain true for an increase to 80 or 90 could be debated endlessly. Here is a study performed by UC Irvine under a grant from a much less controversial organization, AAA. They conclude that the decrease in fatality rates in states that enacted 65 mph limits was between 3.4 and 5.1 percent:

http://www.ibiblio.org/rdu/65-lives.html

I think that your point regarding speed variance and its correlation to safety is a valid one. Coincidentally, the UC Irvine study posits that the decrease in speed variance is one of the three possible contributors which led to our roads becoming safer.

It would be interesting to look at current speed variances in different parts of the country. Where I currently reside, a majority of people speed on the interstate. I know this because I find it amusing to set my cruise control to the speed limit (in the right lane of course and accounting for BMW's speedo skew) and watch as people fly by. I've done this in about 10 states on the east coast with relatively consistent results. If my admittedly unscientific observations are true, there is still more to be done in reducing speed variance. I'd guess that this could be achieved by increasing the limit between 5 and 15 mph depending on the road.

What the average driver expects the speed of others to be shouldn't be an issue. As it stands currently, emergency vehicles routinely exceed posted speed limits by 20 - 30 mph in order to get where they need to go quickly. Perhaps the lights and sirens would alert these drivers, but if you're talking about the same drivers I am, I wouldn't count on it.

The average American driver needs to put down the cell phone and Big Gulp and concentrate on the road. In my mind they are a much bigger danger than speeders paying attention.
Appreciate 0
      08-15-2013, 03:43 PM   #30
NemesisX
Captain
317
Rep
905
Posts

Drives: '19 Infiniti Q60S
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Titanium3er View Post

...

The average American driver needs to put down the cell phone and Big Gulp and concentrate on the road. In my mind they are a much bigger danger than speeders paying attention.
Yeah I'll agree with that. I think tailgating is probably more of potential traffic hazard than absolute speeding. Distracted driving as you mentioned is another huge problem. Texting and/or talking on a cell phone while driving, or even engaging a passenger in the car and turning your head towards them while driving always makes me a little nervous.
Appreciate 0
      08-15-2013, 03:58 PM   #31
donovan
Brigadier General
donovan's Avatar
No_Country
370
Rep
4,167
Posts

Drives: R8 - Ford Raptor
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: National

iTrader: (17)

...yes we need an autobahn, no doubt. Especially in areas away from the city and schools.
__________________

Audi R8 v10
Ford Raptor
m3e46freak@yahoo.comfor all euro parts!!
ebay/craigslist verified/ m3post/e46fanantics/m3forum/zpost/bimmerforum
Appreciate 0
      08-15-2013, 04:23 PM   #32
Mr Tonka
is probably out riding.
Mr Tonka's Avatar
United_States
6058
Rep
2,294
Posts

Drives: Something Italian
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sweatypeninsula

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NemesisX View Post
I'd caution against reading too much into a study by CATO, as they have a vested interest in promoting a "hands-off" policy for philosophical reasons (CATO is a libertarian think tank). I know I might get some flack for trying to hold a study like this to the standards of scientific rigor, but shedding bias and encouraging peer review are feasible standards to strive for even at this level. And moreover, the second link Titanium3er posted actually contained a variety of miniature case studies with different results. A small case study in Michigan showed that increasing speed limits doesn't increase fatalities. A case study elsewhere showed that increasing speed limits does increase fatalities, albeit slightly.

In principle though I'm all for legally increasing speed limits. I have no problem with speeding in and of itself. What usually worried me was speed differential, though not in the absolute naive sense of the phrase (i.e. car 1 travels at 75 in a 70, car 2 travels at 90 in a 70, and I'm worried about 90-75 = 15 MPH). When I say "speed differential," I mean the following -

Car 1 travels at 75 in a 70
Car 2 (coming up from behind) is traveling at 95 in a 70
Car 1 expects car 2 (and all other cars, in fact) to drive within +/- 10 MPH of the posted speed limit.

It's the differential between the speed at which the average driver expects fellow drivers to be driving at and the actual speed they are driving at that worries me. And, I think the importance of paying attention to this difference is magnified on highly interconnected road networks with slower speed limits. People approach a T intersection and are trying to take a right turn and merge onto a 45 MPH street (for example). There's an expectation that fellow drivers around that blind curve aren't flying down at 70 or 80.
Thread title says for interstate speed limits. You don't really have to worry about merging with 45mph cars at a T intersection on interstates. Of course the portions of interstates such as the 275s of I75 will have limits. Heck for half the day you can't go faster than 65 anyway.

Seems simple enough to me to have electronic speed limit signs that monitor the amount of traffic on the road and adjust the speed limit from there. If the monitors sense less than 30% of the roads capacity speed limits are bumped up to say 90mph. If they sense only 5% of the road's capacity, speed limit might be 120mph.

Of course the speed limit signs would have to talk to each other and you would have to have a sign/monitor every mile in more congested areas and maybe every 3 miles in more rural areas. As long as the capacity is under a certain amount for 3 consecutive monitors the limit is bumped up. As traffic builds the speed limits drop down to what they are today.
__________________
"There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of the law and in the name of justice. -Charles de Secondat"
http://www.m3post.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic59612_1.gif
Appreciate 0
      08-15-2013, 04:26 PM   #33
UncleWede
Long Time Admirer, First Time Owner
UncleWede's Avatar
United_States
17871
Rep
9,376
Posts

Drives: G01 X3 M40i Dark Graphite
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oxnard, CA

iTrader: (0)

Tiered licensing sounds like a good idea, but I think there would be huge issues with proper enforcement. You think people like to complain now about "da man hasslin me" wait until there is a different rule set.
Patrol officer sees a car flash by at well above the normal limit. How does he know the driver has a top tier license? Short of pulling him over and checking?

Myself, I'm still hoping for the teleportation technology to arrive . . .
Appreciate 0
      08-15-2013, 05:36 PM   #34
bjayfan
Private First Class
9
Rep
145
Posts

Drives: 2014 F13 M6
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Titanium3er View Post
If the governmentS devoted some serious effort to driver education, road maintenance, and vehicle inspections I think we could get there (but likely never will).
Plural, the states set speed limits, the fed just gives or holds back money depending on what the states do.
Appreciate 0
      08-15-2013, 05:39 PM   #35
bjayfan
Private First Class
9
Rep
145
Posts

Drives: 2014 F13 M6
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

At one point we had some business interests in Montana. The longish drive from Billings to Great Falls had sections with no speed limits, most drove within their capabilities.

It would only work in sparsely populated areas.
Appreciate 0
      08-15-2013, 05:42 PM   #36
Titanium3er
First Lieutenant
Titanium3er's Avatar
United_States
19
Rep
345
Posts

Drives: '08 335i, '03 Kawa Z1000
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SW FL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjayfan
Plural, the states set speed limits, the fed just gives or holds back money depending on what the states do.
I was writing in general terms, but your correction is noted.
Appreciate 0
      08-15-2013, 05:47 PM   #37
Mr Tonka
is probably out riding.
Mr Tonka's Avatar
United_States
6058
Rep
2,294
Posts

Drives: Something Italian
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sweatypeninsula

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Templar View Post
Pretty much what everyone else said. Without tougher drivers ed and requirements to get the license, it would be a mess.

After living in Germany for a while, I know they are doing it right...
This, so it's possible. It's just going to take effort. Even though absolute unrestricted speed sections are dwindling, it's still possible.
__________________
"There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of the law and in the name of justice. -Charles de Secondat"
http://www.m3post.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic59612_1.gif
Appreciate 0
      08-15-2013, 06:26 PM   #38
bjayfan
Private First Class
9
Rep
145
Posts

Drives: 2014 F13 M6
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Titanium3er View Post
I was writing in general terms, but your correction is noted.
I'll tend to overreact when anyone suggests, insinuates, or otherwise leads me to believe that having the (or any) government fix something is a good idea. Sorry if I offended.
Appreciate 0
      08-15-2013, 06:42 PM   #39
Titanium3er
First Lieutenant
Titanium3er's Avatar
United_States
19
Rep
345
Posts

Drives: '08 335i, '03 Kawa Z1000
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SW FL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjayfan
I'll tend to overreact when anyone suggests, insinuates, or otherwise leads me to believe that having the (or any) government fix something is a good idea. Sorry if I offended.
No offense taken.

I agree that most of what they touch turns to sh*t, but my belief is that transportation is one of the few things government needs to be responsible for. Even if that responsibility is collecting taxes to fund it and coordinating private industries involvement.
Appreciate 0
      08-16-2013, 02:59 AM   #40
Dodo
Extinct
Germany
11
Rep
81
Posts

Drives: Slow
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SC

iTrader: (0)

I think that an important point that has so far been missing from this discussion is the necessity for an effective and far reaching public transport system if you want to make it much more difficult to get a license.

Doesn't seem feasable in the US due to geography (outside of major metro areas), but I think it is a requirement for a system like that in Germany...

$.02
Appreciate 0
      08-17-2013, 07:13 PM   #41
Bakeme521
Some say...
Bakeme521's Avatar
United_States
239
Rep
4,296
Posts

Drives: Fresh
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Baton Rouge n NOLA

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2007 BMW 335i  [8.24]
I agree with others above, it is way to easy to get a license in this country. Until that changes I wouldn't feel comfortable with it. Too many people cause accidents on our current speed limits bc they are oblivious of how to actually drive.

Although if they did decide to implement some sort of autobahn my 335 will be getting a full cage and six point harnesses.
__________________

I have exhaust and an intake...
Appreciate 0
      08-17-2013, 09:51 PM   #42
Mr Tonka
is probably out riding.
Mr Tonka's Avatar
United_States
6058
Rep
2,294
Posts

Drives: Something Italian
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sweatypeninsula

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakeme521 View Post
I agree with others above, it is way to easy to get a license in this country. Until that changes I wouldn't feel comfortable with it. Too many people cause accidents on our current speed limits bc they are oblivious of how to actually drive.

Although if they did decide to implement some sort of autobahn my 335 will be getting a full cage and six point harnesses.
Cause you're in good shape when crashing at 80mph?

The way i see it is that our traffic patterns and speed limits have turned driving into this annoying thing people have to do in order to go somewhere. With most annoying things, people tend to find something to do during the monotony.

All accidents and close calls i've been in happened when i was just strolling along with traffic doing what all the other sheeple were doing. It's like the herd of stupid wildebeests crossing the croc infested river. Just following the herd into deadly situation.
__________________
"There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of the law and in the name of justice. -Charles de Secondat"
http://www.m3post.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic59612_1.gif
Appreciate 0
      08-18-2013, 12:30 AM   #43
TimZ
Lieutenant
TimZ's Avatar
Albania
33
Rep
576
Posts

Drives: X5M
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

I would love to have overall speed limits reviewed and increased. As far as no speed limit zones go, those will have to go further out in rural areas. In sorry, I just don't see any road near the NYC area capable of safely traveling at 100+
But places about 30 minutes out of the city can sure use these speed limit free zones. New driving tests are a must as well as keeping up with infrastructure.
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST