View Single Post
      04-23-2009, 02:02 AM   #5
TWiTCHY
Colonel
TWiTCHY's Avatar
No_Country
376
Rep
2,526
Posts

Drives: '13 AW E92 M3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: WA

iTrader: (6)

I've never had the 18-200mm. I bought the D300 body only. I figured I wouldn't need the VR on the 70-200mm since I could just buy a $30 monopod to support the 80-200mm, but I didn't really think about the focusing; you're right on that one, I just don't know if it's worth the difference. I can't really afford to wait that long to get the 24-70mm either. I have considered doing just that - buy the 70-200mm and try to survive with that and my 50mm f/1.4 until I get the funds to buy the 24-70mm, but I don't know if it's worth it. Maybe I could opt for a cheaper, used, 28-70mm?
Appreciate 0