|
02-22-2011, 11:44 PM
|
#14
|
Drives: N/A
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikkahtropolis
Something tells me that has to be conservative. This thing is lighter (3470lbs vs 3830lbs), with a better weight distribution for launch (midengine vs frontengine), plus it has more power (690bhp vs 530bhp) and an equally capable transmission (50ms shifts vs 200ms), all on much fatter tires (255F/335R vs 285 all around).
Either this thing is geared for space or it's simply underrated. My guess is definitely the latter.
|
My guess is BOTH. 
|
|
|
|