View Single Post
      04-16-2014, 05:58 PM   #52
swanson
Convicted Felon
swanson's Avatar
733
Rep
2,180
Posts

Drives: chariot
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pukicabuki View Post
High HP/displacement simply eludes to small displacement high revving engines which all inherently lack torque. The 6.2 AMG engine may not make 100hp/L, but it certainly makes significantly more torque and has a much broader power band. You see 100hp/L as some kind of significant achievement. I see it as a really high strung engine that you have to wring the shit out of in order for it to perform. Big displacement AMG engines allow for a much more usable power band in a package that is much less stressed.


I cant believe people are still stuck in the 100hp/liter mentality. I'd take a bigger displacement engine that make useable power and torque throughout the rev band over a smaller, high strung, ticking time bomb engine that needs to be revved super high in order to make any power with a gutless bottom end.
Appreciate 0